tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-833547834321864748.post3666341107058058472..comments2023-10-31T01:42:26.102+11:00Comments on Fringe Faith: iChurch 2.0Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03059054907843482358noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-833547834321864748.post-13240438545926206302009-09-30T09:30:20.745+10:002009-09-30T09:30:20.745+10:00TL - very funny. Perhaps I should have called this...TL - very funny. Perhaps I should have called this post Spreading the Christian message. <br /><br />David - Thank you. I think perhaps passion is one of those things that determine whether the church is being relevant or simply trying too hard to be trendy. If you do something because you are passionate about it, people will see that passion. If you do something solely because you think it's trendy, it doesn't come across so well.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059054907843482358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-833547834321864748.post-39865409109330862552009-09-30T06:12:49.056+10:002009-09-30T06:12:49.056+10:00I like your passion! It all comes down to the fac...I like your passion! It all comes down to the fact that Jesus message never changes. The challenge for "the church" is to ensure the application of that message is relevant. Relevance doesn't mean trendy...it just has to be perceived by the people receiving it as having some practical application to their daily life - otherwise it is just religion. Thaks for sharing!David (Marketing Integrity)http://navigateyourmarketing.com/blog/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-833547834321864748.post-21281874117297018012009-09-29T12:57:17.591+10:002009-09-29T12:57:17.591+10:00Jesus should be like Vegemite? Ah, he must be so p...Jesus should be like Vegemite? Ah, he must be so proud to have people like you spreading his message.TLnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-833547834321864748.post-77108962858190317242009-09-29T12:27:28.532+10:002009-09-29T12:27:28.532+10:00Jesus would never discriminate against a person fo...Jesus would never discriminate against a person for having a dumb name. I don't know if you've realised this, but iSnack 2.0 isn't actually a person. It's a product that deliberately uses a name in order to attract more sales. And many of the purchases we do make are influenced, in some way, by the names they have. That's why an enormous amount of money is spent trying to find the right names for products.<br /><br />Seriously, prejudice - against a spread. I'll tell you what else Jesus would do. He would spend more time worrying about how people are being treated, rather than sticking up for the rights of products that may lose sales because of the awful names they have chosen.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03059054907843482358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-833547834321864748.post-8908435205853975072009-09-29T10:17:09.728+10:002009-09-29T10:17:09.728+10:00You refuse to eat a product with a dumb name despi...You refuse to eat a product with a dumb name despite it's other appeal? That sounds like prejudice WWJD.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com